AI is reshaping how teachers plan, differentiate, and manage their time, but adoption is moving faster than implementation. Schools are embracing AI quickly, yet the clarity and structure needed to use it well are still catching up.
To better understand how educators are experiencing this shift, Faria brought the question to future school leaders at the NJPSA/FEA Honored Educators Summit 2026, a gathering designed to support rising leaders as they build their skills and professional community.
Through conversations and surveys, one thing became clear: this isn't a simple yes-or-no conversation. There is real tension in how AI is showing up in schools, and leaders will play a pivotal role in navigating it.
The AI Tension Triangle
Three themes emerged consistently across responses, forming what we're calling the AI Tension Triangle, a simple framework for understanding the current reality in schools:
Efficiency – what teachers love
Risk – what teachers fear
Support – what teachers need
![]()
Efficiency: AI is Here to Stay
Teachers are sold on AI, and it's easy to see why. Saving time, accessing a constant thought partner, differentiating instruction, and generating lesson plans were among the most cited benefits. As one educator put it,
"It helps me work smarter, not harder."
For time-strapped teachers, getting time back is hard to argue with.
That said, AI works best as a thought partner when educators stay critical of its outputs and ground them in what they know about their students. As it becomes further embedded in daily workflows, the question shifts from whether to use it, to how, and that's where risk enters the picture.
Risk: The Fear isn't AI Itself, It's What it Replaces
The concern educators raised wasn't that AI is too powerful. It's that thinking becomes optional. The issues keeping leaders up at night include loss of student critical thinking, questions of authenticity and academic integrity, and privacy concerns.
These fears broadly fall into two categories: policies and procedures around AI use, and student use of AI specifically.
Like any new tool, AI can be adopted quickly without enough reflection on the when, how, and why. Mitigating that risk is a core part of leadership. Helping teachers guide students in understanding when and how to use AI, and crucially, how to distinguish their own thinking from AI-generated work, will be essential to turning these risks into opportunities.
Check out our Deliberation Station for Students to help them determine when to use AI.
Support: The Biggest Unmet Need
These concerns point directly to the third side of the triangle: Support. The biggest unmet need we are seeing and hearing from educators is support, from policies to guardrails. Educators are not resisting AI they are asking for:
Clear expectations
Age-appropriate guardrails
Practical, ongoing training
Trusted tools
We're in a moment where adoption is outpacing formal implementation, and that's actually an opportunity. Since educators and students are already using AI, the priority for leaders is to establish the clear policies and responsible guardrails that make that use safe, effective, and intentional.
CTA: Curious where to start? Check out our Policy Review Sheet
The Leadership Challenge
The challenge for leaders isn’t whether to use AI, it’s how to balance efficiency, risk, and support without sacrificing what matters most, student learning. The problem right now isn’t students or teachers, it is a systems problem. Taking the time right now to establish clear expectations and guardrails will allow AI to be used in a thoughtful and purposeful way in schools. It’s not possible to eliminate every risk or concern, but being clear about when, how, and why AI is used can create a shared understanding and greater confidence for everyone involved.
Here's where to start:
1. Define a clear vision for AI use
What role should AI play in teaching and learning?
When should it support thinking and when should it not be used?
2. Build guardrails, not bans
Policies provide common language and understanding
Age-appropriate, transparent expectations
3. Invest in practical, ongoing professional learning
Build out systemic professional learning
Ensure that the focus is on application of the learning based on the policies in place
4. Audit your technology ecosystem
What are their risk levels?
Provide clarity on when certain actions and tools are ok to use and when they are not
Wherever you are in your AI journey as a leader, now is the time to reflect and move forward with intention. The goal isn't to choose between efficiency, ethics, and support. It's to design for all three.
Many thanks to the educators at the NJPSA/FEA Honored Educators Summit 2026 for sharing your insights with Faria.
If you are interested in more AI resources check out our AI in Education Hub.
